Skip to main content

The Marginal Propensity to Consume is generally high for most developing countries including Ghana, yet the size of the National Income is low



Propensity to consume (Economies), as the proportion of total income or an increase in income that consumers tend to spend on goods and services rather than to save. The ratio of total consumption to total income is known as the average propensity to consume; an increase in consumption caused by an addition to income divided by that increase in income is known as the marginal propensity to consume. Because households divide their incomes between consumption expenditures and saving, the sum of the propensity to consume and the propensity to save will always equal one.
Ghana being classified as a developing country is due to, our level of poverty in the country. The question is that, why Ghana and the other developing countries have a high Marginal Propensity to Consume and yet the size of the National Income is low? This because Ghana and other developing countries are been classified as a lower income country and also goes a lot in line with low-income families of the nationals in the country. The average propensity to consume out of current income is usually thought to be higher for low-income families than for high-income families. Families in the lowest income bracket, for example, may be forced to dissave or go into debt merely to provide themselves with basic necessities, whereas these same necessities require a much smaller proportion of high incomes. The low-income family’s average propensity to consume may therefore be greater than one and the high-income family’s some fraction of one.
The nature of MPC in Ghana; The MPC is higher in the case of the poor than in the  case of the rich people and the greater proportion of Ghana’s population falls below the poverty line (Low-Income Families). The greater a person’s income, the more his basic human needs would have been met, and the greater his or her tendency to save in order to provide for future will be. The marginal propensity to save of the richer classes is greater than that of the poorer classes. If, at any time, it is desired to increase aggregate consumption, then the purchasing power should be transferred from the richer classes (with low propensity to consume) to the poorer classes (with a higher propensity to consume). Likewise, if it is desired to reduce community consumption, the purchasing power must be taken away from the poorer classes by taxing consumption. The marginal propensity to consume is higher in the case of poorer countries and lower in the case of richer country. The reason is same as stated above. In the case of rich country, most of the basic needs of the people have already been satisfied, and all the additional increments of income are saved, resulting in a higher marginal propensity to save but in a lower marginal propensity to consume. In a poor country, on the other hand, most of the basic needs of the people remain unsatisfied so that additional increments of income go to increase consumption, resulting in a higher marginal propensity to consume and a lower marginal propensity to save. This is the reason MPC is higher in the underdeveloped country like Ghana, and lower in developed countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SHOULD GHANA JOIN BRICS? INSIGHTS FROM JACOB ZUMA – UPSA LEADERSHIP LECTURES

  BRICS and the Shifting Global Order The BRICS grouping, coined by Jim O’Neill of Goldman Sachs in 2001, includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, and, later, South Africa. This group represents key emerging economies, aiming to reshape global economic governance to better represent the interests of rapidly developing countries. Today, BRICS has evolved into a significant multilateral platform, accounting for over 40% of the global population and more than 30% of world GDP in purchasing power parity (PPP), along with a growing share of international trade. The group has established institutions like the New Development Bank (NDB) and the Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA), promoting infrastructure financing and providing support against financial shocks. At the 2023 Johannesburg Summit, BRICS expanded to include Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Iran, Egypt, and Ethiopia, becoming "BRICS+" and signaling a goal of creating a more balanced global economic framework....

The relationship between the Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) and the Multiplier (K)

The Multiplier (K) is the ratio of a change in National Income to the change in government spending that cause it. The mechanism that gives rise to a multiplier effect is that an initial incremental amount of spending can lead to increased in consumption spending, increasing income further and hence further increasing consumption and whiles The  Marginal Propensity  to Consume (MPC) is defined as the proportion of the aggregate raise in pay that is utilized on the consumption of goods and services opposing to the amount being saved. It can also be defined as Induced Consumption as this shows the consumption of goods and services due to increase in disposable incomes. The relationship between the Multiplier (K) and Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) is that, the multiplier relies on the MPC (Marginal Propensity to Consume) in an open economy. So, if there is an increase in the MPC it will eventually be an increase in the Multiplier and vice verse. Some consu...

MELCOM GHANA ADOPTION OF LOW COST LEADERSHIP STRATEGY IN GHANA.

According to M E Porter which he described cost leadership strategy as cost business strategies as when a company tries to provide a product at lower cost than any of its competitors and also a margin of flexibility to a firm to lower price if the competition becomes stiff and jet to earn more or less the same level of profit. To our observation to this, a company or firms competitive advantage depends on low cost of their products and services against it competitors.    Porter’s explanation for this is that firm with high market shares are successful because they pursued a low cost leadership cost strategy. Commenting on this; we also realized that cost leadership strategy can also be called as low cost strategy. Assumption was given to firms or company that win its market shares by appealing to cost conscious and costumers being sensitive to low price of commodity with its target market by creating customer values and wants. To succeed in offering the lowest price s...